Skip to Content
Tea Regulation
|
| |
 |
Tea dumped by American
patriots into Boston Harbor before the start of the American Revolution
would have been largely green (unfermented) tea. Unscrupulous merchants
developed the practice of "facing" this type of tea, that is, adding
potentially harmful ingredients such as talc, clay, and gypsum to improve
its appearance and give it the blue-green color characteristic of green
tea. Facing allowed them to disguise inferior quality and increase the
weight. Cultural differences helped perpetuate the fraud. Whereas the
Japanese valued the fragrance and delicate aroma of their green teas,
Americans tended to judge a tea's quality solely by its color. Methods
were developed to detect these adulterations. |
| |
|
The 1913 Gould Net Weight Amendment
was targeted at tea and other potentially deceptive packaged food
products. This law requires all packaged food products to clearly display
an accurate net-weight on the label. Traditionally, tea was sold by the
pound, half-pound and quarter-pound. In packaged form, it had proven an
easy target for short-weighting. This woman is buying a traditional
half-pound size package of black tea, but it is clearly marked 7 oz., one
ounce short of a full half-pound. |
| |
|
| |
The Tea Board met
every year for 99 years, except during World War II when tea was rationed.
Congress abolished the program in 1996, one year shy of its one-hundredth
anniversary. Although the tea industry itself had paid for the advisory
Tea Board's services since the 1950s, several administrations attempted to
portray it as a quaint example of the useless proliferation of government
advisory committees, and vowed to have it abolished. It proved a little
more difficult to curtail since it was a law rather than a regulation, so
it wasn't until 1996 that Congress itself passed an act repealing its own
Tea Act.
Alhough there is no longer a Supervising Tea Examiner employed by the
government, tea imported into the U.S. is still regulated as a beverage by
the Food and Drug Administration. Tea was and still is particularly
vulnerable to mustiness and mold, as well as to adulteration and
short-weighting. |
| |
|
| |
| Over the years, FDA has acted
against many teas promoting everything from weight loss to curing heart
disease and ulcers. Teas making medicinal claims, such as this herbal
Desert Tea which claimed in 1935 to help people stop using ordinary tea
and coffee, were subject to legal action. Teas promoting weight loss are
still being touted. Atomic weapons testing also resulted in the
radioactive contamination of some teas during the 1950s. |
| |
 |
Teas that are refused entry into the
U.S. can be appealed. A 1962 letter by an import broker protesting the
refusal of his kind of tea (consisting largely of stems) states: "A
Japanese dietician invented a tea used mainly tea stems instead leaves
which contains least caffeine which means least exciting for our nervous
system. . . . I can't understand why you scientific Americas stick to an
old idea that the tea must be made of tea leaves. It (this) [sic] the
reason you cast away the tea into the sea at Boston which started the
Independent War?"
|
| |
|
Among the memorable seizures of
tea in the nation's history, is that of He No Tea. Consisting
principally of dried Kentucky bluegrass, it was certainly not a standard
tea in any traditional sense, and it was seized and charged with
misbranding. In court, the product was reportedly defended by a Chinese
attorney, however, who argued (and lost) that the name was entirely
accurate since it was "hay" and had "No Tea."
|
Last reviewed: 09 April 2008
Last updated: 13 August 2004
First published: 13 August 2004
Metadata| Permanence level: Permanent: Stable Content