The New Forensic Science
New technologies and methods are transforming the field of forensic science. Today scientists use DNA tests, high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, 3-D computer imaging, and other advanced technologies to reconstruct crimes and accidents. The new forensic science can distinguish trace elements and organic materials down to the level of only a few hundred molecules.
Given the sensitivity of the instruments, forensic scientists need to adhere to rigorous procedures and standards to ensure that their results are valid and reliable—and can withstand scrutiny in courts of law and public opinion. Used carefully and evenhandedly, the new forensics can help uncover hidden crimes, convict the guilty, and exonerate the innocent. Sophisticated science now plays a key role in identifying victims of crimes, accidents, disasters, and wars—and provides reassurance, closure, and emotional support for bereaved survivors.
The New Forensic Science
DNA Forensics: Making the Molecular Body Visible
Forensic biologists conduct scientific analysis of blood, semen, saliva, and other forms of biological evidence. Their work provides crucial information in criminal investigations, paternity cases, and a variety of civil matters. During the past 20 years, DNA analysis has emerged as an indispensable method of identifying suspects and victims of crimes. Scientists continue to develop ever more sophisticated methods of identifying degraded or aged remains, along with protocols for managing data in cases where large numbers of people die or suffer injury.
DNA chart, 1998
Courtesy Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC
Key accomplishments: DNA
Gregor Mendel
Heredity
Experiments with peas lead Austrian monk Gregor Mendel to discover that certain traits are inherited in varying proportions, depending on whether they are recessive or dominant.
1869
Frederich Miescher
First DNA Isolation
Swiss physician Frederich Miescher isolates DNA from cells. Miescher calls it "nuclein." Later, it becomes known as nucleic acid.
1909
Wilhelm Johannsen
The Term "Gene" is Coined
German scientist Wilhelm Johannsen names the Mendelian unit of heredity "gene," from the Greek word, "give birth to."
1928
Frederick Griffith, Jr.
Gene Transformation Suggested
British microbiologist Frederick Griffith's experiments with pneumococcus prove that a "transforming principle" allows genes to transfer from one bacterium to another.
1944
Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty
DNA Transforms Cells
American geneticists Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty prove that DNA is the "transforming principle"—the vehicle for passing hereditary information through generations.
1950
Erwin Chargaff
Chargaff's Rule
Austrian-American biochemist Erwin Chargaff discovers equal amounts of adenine and thymine, and cytosine and guanine, a distinctive pattern of base-pairing regularities in DNA. In 1950 he publishes his findings.
1952
Alfred D. Hershey and Martha Chase
Genes are Made of DNA
American geneticists Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase demonstrate that only the DNA of a virus needs to enter a bacterium to infect it, proving that genes are made of DNA.
1959
Arthur Kornberg and Severo Ochoa
Polymerase and RNA Identified
American biochemist Arthur Kornberg and Spanish born biochemist Severo Ochoa share the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discovery of polymerases in the biologic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid.
1961
Sydney Brenner, François Jacob, and Matthew Meselson
Cellular Messengers: mRNA
South African chemist Sydney Brenner, French biologist François Jacob, and American geneticist Matthew Meselson show that short-lived RNA molecules, which they called messenger RNA (mRNA), carry the genetic instructions from DNA to structures in the cell called ribosomes, (the site of protein synthesis).
1962
James D. Watson and Frances H. Crick
DNA structure is a double helix
In 1953, James Watson and Frances Crick propose a three-dimensional model for the structure of DNA: a double helix molecule formed by two chains, each composed of alternating sugar and phosphate groups, connected by nitrogenous bases. Watson and Crick (with British biophysicist Maurice Wilkins) are awarded the 1962 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology.
1978
Werner Arber and Hamilton Smith
Role of Restriction Enzymes
Swiss molecular biologist Werner Arber shows how specialized enzymes can cut DNA into short strands. These enzymes are subsequently dubbed "restriction enzymes." In 1970, American molecular biologist Hamilton Smith and colleagues determine that restriction enzymes can cut DNA molecules at precise and predictable locations. Arber shares the 1978 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology with Smith and American biologist Daniel Nathans.
1980
Frederick Sanger, Alan Coulson, Alan Maxam, and Walter Gilbert
DNA Sequencing Methods Developed
In the 1960s and 1970s, British scientists Frederick Sanger and Alan Coulson, and Alan Maxam and Walter Gilbert in the United States, develop DNA sequencing techniques. Automated equipment makes DNA sequencing a speedy, routine laboratory procedure. Gilbert and Sanger win the 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work.
David Botstein, Ronald W. Davis, Mark Skolnick, and Ray White
Restriction-Fragment-Length Polymorphism (RFLP) proposed
American geneticist David Botstein, biochemist Ronald W. Davis, population geneticist Mark Skolnick, and biologist Ray White publish a paper on their theory that restriction fragment-length-polymorphisms (RFLPs) can be used to produce a linkage map of the human genome and to map the genes that cause disease in humans.
1984
Alec Jeffreys
Variable Numbers of Tandem Repeats
British geneticist Alec Jeffreys finds that multiple copies of short nucleotide sequences, 3 to 30 base pairs long, are repeated one after another, 20 to 100 times [e.g., GACTGACTGACT]. These groups of repeat sequences, called minisatellites or VNTRs (variable number of tandem repeats), are now known to be widely scattered throughout the human genome. The number of these regions at different loci are different in each individual.
1991
Alec Jeffreys
Short Tandem Repeats in DNA Analysis
Geneticist Alec Jeffreys develops short tandem repeat (STR) DNA typing, which the forensic community adopts as its standard.
Key accomplishments: DNA
Gregor Mendel
Experiments with peas lead Austrian monk Gregor Mendel to discover that certain traits are inherited in varying proportions, depending on whether they are recessive or dominant.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Oswald Avery
American geneticists Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty prove that DNA is the "transforming principle"—the vehicle for passing hereditary information through generations.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Colin MacLeod
American geneticists Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty prove that DNA is the "transforming principle"—the vehicle for passing hereditary information through generations
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Maclyn McCarty
American geneticists Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty prove that DNA is the "transforming principle"—the vehicle for passing hereditary information through generations
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Alfred D. Hershey
American geneticists Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase demonstrate that only the DNA of a virus needs to enter a bacterium to infect it, proving that genes are made of DNA.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Arthur Kornberg
American biochemist Arthur Kornberg and Spanish born biochemist Severo Ochoa share the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discovery of polymerases in the biologic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
James Watson
In 1953, James Watson and Frances Crick propose a three-dimensional model for the structure of DNA: a double helix molecule formed by two chains, each composed of alternating sugar and phosphate groups, connected by nitrogenous bases. Watson and Crick (with British biophysicist Maurice Wilkins) are awarded the 1962 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Frederick Sanger
In the 1960s and 1970s, British scientists Frederick Sanger and Alan Coulson, and Alan Maxam and Walter Gilbert in the United States, develop DNA sequencing techniques. Automated equipment makes DNA sequencing a speedy, routine laboratory procedure. Gilbert and Sanger win the 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Walter Gilbert
In the 1960s and 1970s, British scientists Frederick Sanger and Alan Coulson, and Alan Maxam and Walter Gilbert in the United States, develop DNA sequencing techniques. Automated equipment makes DNA sequencing a speedy, routine laboratory procedure. Gilbert and Sanger win the 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Alec Jeffreys at work in his University of Leicester laboratory, 1985
British geneticist Alec Jeffreys began working in 1977 on a technique that could identify individuals through samples of their DNA. In 1984, he and colleagues devised a way to use a newly discovered property of DNA, isolated areas of great variability between individuals called restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP), for forensic identification—the original DNA fingerprint.
In 1986, police asked Jeffreys for help in finding a man who had raped and killed two girls. DNA tests exonerated the primary suspect. Through a genetic dragnet, police found the perpetrator, Colin Pitchfork, who gave himself away when he asked a friend for a substitute blood sample.
Within a year, genetic fingerprinting was making the unique molecular structures of victims and suspects visible in criminal investigations around the world. Today, RFLP-based DNA analysis is being supplanted by newer techniques of genetic identification.
Courtesy University of Leicester
Michael Blassie unknown no more
Air Force equipment found with Michael Blassie
From top left to bottom right: dog tag chain fragment, signal marker pouch, match holder, parachute survival guide, and ammunition pouch.
The timely and accurate identification of men and women who die while serving in the armed forces has long been a priority for the United States government. The Armed Forces have adopted the latest advances in fingerprint and dental identification, and forensic anthropology and radiology. But not all remains can be identified with such methods. Records can get damaged or destroyed, and post-mortem materials can be affected by decomposition, body fragmentation and exposure to heat.
With the invention of the polymerase chain reaction in 1985, DNA analysis moved to the forefront of forensic technologies. In 1991 the Department of Defense founded the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL). AFDIL has used DNA analysis to identify the remains of at least 150 military personnel from Vietnam, Korea, and World War 2, and assisted in the identification of victims from high profile disasters, both natural and man-made. Now that DNA samples are taken from everyone who joins the U.S. Armed Forces, there may never be another American "unknown soldier."
Courtesy The Blassie Family
Air Force flight suit fragments and holster fragment found with Michael Blassie
Courtesy The Blassie Family
The Blassie siblings pose for a family photo, 1961
Michael holds his baby brother George, and his youngest sister Pat sits to his right. Judy stands behind Mary, who turns to look at her brothers.
Human beings have copies of DNA from each biological parent, stored in the nucleus of every cell. DNA is also stored in tiny, energy-producing structures in the cells, called mitochondria. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) differs from nuclear DNA because human beings inherit mtDNA solely from the mother and share this information with siblings and maternal relatives. Unlike nuclear DNA, each cell carries more than a hundred copies of mtDNA, since each cell contains many mitochondria but only one nucleus. The ability to match mtDNA between related individuals, and the fact that it does not degrade as rapidly as nuclear DNA, makes it a valuable tool in the identification of human remains.
Courtesy The Blassie Family
Air Force Academy Cadet Michael Blassie, 1966
Michael Joseph Blassie, the oldest of five children of a St. Louis meat cutter, entered the Air Force Academy in 1966 and received his officer's commission in June 1970. During a tour of Vietnam, he served as a member of the 8th Special Operations Squadron. On May 11, 1972, at age 24, his A-37B Dragonfly aircraft was shot down near An Loc, about 60 miles north of Saigon.
Immediate recovery attempts were launched, but Blassie had crashed in an area controlled by enemy forces so it was impossible to examine the crash site. Five months later, during a sweep of the area, a South Vietnamese Army patrol recovered a pelvis, an upper arm bone, and some ribs, as well as the remnants of a flight suit, a life raft, pieces of a parachute, and part of a USAF holster. The remains and associated materials were eventually turned over to the U.S. Army Central Identification Laboratory, Hawaii for analysis and identification. They were initially classified as belonging to Lt. Blassie. However, analysis at the time suggested that the remains were not a compelling match to Blassie's age and height. With the conflicting information between the forensic analysis and the physical evidence, the remains were designated as "Unknown" and assigned the number "X-26."
Courtesy The Blassie Family
Reinterment Ceremony for 1st Lt. Michael Blassie, July 10, 1998
1st Lt. Michael Blassie was escorted by brother George Blassie.
Courtesy The Blassie Family
Rescued from death row: Kirk Bloodsworth and the Innocence Project
Kirk Bloodsworth, 2003
Kirk Bloodsworth currently works for The Justice Project, a non-profit group that seeks legislative improvements that will prevent the American criminal justice system from sentencing innocent men and women to death for crimes they did not commit.
Courtesy Dan Mullen / The Justice Project
Peter J. Neufeld [left], and Barry C. Scheck [right]
In 1992, lawyers Barry Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld created the Innocence Project, a nonprofit legal clinic that takes on cases where post-conviction DNA testing of evidence can yield proof of innocence not available at the time of trial.
Courtesy The Innocence Project
A. I. M. Letter, December 8, 1987
While in prison, Bloodsworth launched a letter-writing campaign to protest his innocence, always signing his letters "A. I. M." ("An Innocent Man").
Courtesy Jayne Miller, WBAL-TV
Pages from Bloodsworth's Journal, August 10, 1987
Courtesy Kirk Noble Bloodsworth
Pages from Bloodsworth's Journal, August 10, 1987
Courtesy Kirk Noble Bloodsworth
Pages from Bloodsworth's Journal, August 10, 1987
Courtesy Kirk Noble Bloodsworth
The New Forensic Science
Forensic Toxicology
Scientists and researchers continue to improve and discover new means of separating, analyzing, and identifying chemical substances. Techniques are becoming more specialized, and technologies are being combined to create ever more sensitive and sophisticated tests.
Two increasingly important approaches to chemical detection and identification are gas chromatography, a method of separating substances, and mass spectrometry, a method of measuring the mass of molecules. These techniques allow investigators to identify with reasonable certainty—admissible in a court of law—minute amounts of toxic substances found in the bodies of victims or in trace evidence collected at crime scenes.
Key accomplishments: toxicology
1702
Richard Mead
First Publication on Poisons
Richard Mead's A Mechanical Account of Poisons in Several Essays is the first book in English devoted entirely to the discussion of poisons.
1752
First Chemical Tests in a Trial
The Mary Blandy case in England is the first reported use of chemical tests to detect arsenic in a legal trial.
1814
Mathieu Orfila
First Toxicology Publication
In France, Mathieu Orfila's Traité des Poisons is the first book devoted entirely to the subject of toxicology. Orfila popularizes the word "toxicology."
1836
James Marsh
Marsh Test Devised
English chemist James Marsh devises a test for identifying trace amounts of arsenic.
1851
Jean-Servais Stas
Alkaloid Poison Test Developed
Belgian chemist Jean-Servais Stas develops a method for detecting vegetable alkaloid poisons (caffeine, quinine, morphine, strychnine, atropine, opium) in dead bodies.
1860
Robert Wilhelm Eberhard Bunsen and Gustav Robert Kirchhoff
Spectrum Analysis Developed
With the aid of the spectroscope, which they invented in 1859, German chemist Robert Bunsen and physicist Gustav Kirchhoff discover that vaporizing a substance creates a unique "signature" spectrum, which can be used to identify it. Using the spectroscope, in 1860, Bunsen and Kirchhoff discover two new alkali metals—cesium and rubidium.
1906
Mikhail Tswett
Paper Chromatography Developed
Italian-born Russian botanist Mikhail Tswett invents paper chromatography, initially to study the make-up of plant proteins such as chlorophyll.
1926
Theodor Svedberg
Ultracentrifuge Developed
Swedish chemist Theodor Svedberg builds the first ultracentrifuge—a machine that separates particles by mass—making it possible to determine precisely the molecular weights of highly complex proteins. Svedberg wins the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1926 for his invention of the ultracentrifuge and studies in the chemistry of colloids.
1941
Arnold Beckman, Howard Cary and Warren Baxter at National Technical Laboratories (now Beckman Coulter)
Ultraviolet Spectrophotometer Introduced
The Beckman model DU spectrophotometer is the first instrument to probe the ultraviolet region with high precision and accuracy. According to Bruce Merrifield, Nobel Laureate in chemistry, the DU is "probably the most important instrument ever developed in the advancement of bioscience."
1948
Arne Tiselius
Electrophoresis and Adsorption Developed
During the 1920s and 1930s, Swedish chemist Arne Tiselius helps develop and improve electrophoresis and analysis by adsorption. In 1948, he receives the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work.
1950s
New Technologies Incorporated
Ultraviolet and infrared spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, and paper chromatography are applied to forensic science.
1952
Richard L. M. Synge and Archer J. P. Martin
Partition Chromatography Developed
British biochemists Archer J. P. Martin and Richard L. M. Synge demonstrate partition chromatography to the Biochemical Society at a 1941 meeting in London. They share the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1952 for their development of partition chromatography.
1953
Gas Chromatography Developed
The first commercial gas chromatograph is manufactured.
1966
New Technologies Incorporated
Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), a technique that measures various infrared wavelengths, and atomic absorption spectroscopy, which uses the absorption of light to measure the concentration of gas-phase atoms, are invented.
Key accomplishments: toxicology
Robert Bunsen
With the aid of the spectroscope, which they invented in 1859, German chemist Robert Bunsen and physicist Gustav Kirchhoff discover that vaporizing a substance creates a unique "signature" spectrum, which can be used to identify it. Using the spectroscope, in 1860, Bunsen and Kirchhoff discover two new alkali metals—cesium and rubidium.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Arne Tiselius
During the 1920s and 1930s, Swedish chemist Arne Tiselius helps develop and improve electrophoresis and analysis by adsorption. In 1948, he receives the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
A "lab of last resort" solving the Efren Saldivar case
"I got a hit…and it took the wind out of my lungs. It was a real homicide…The patients had died a terrible death."
—Brian Andresen, Ph.D., American forensic chemist, 2004
In 1998 a respiratory therapist at a Glendale, California hospital told police that he had ended the lives of 50 patients. Efren Saldivar stated that he had deliberately overdosed patients with pancuronium bromide (Pavulon) or succinylcholine chloride. But, when he recanted his confession, police were forced to release him for lack of evidence.
Experts then referred detectives to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Forensic Science Center, sometimes called the "lab of last resort." There, Dr. Brian Andresen said Pavulon might still be detectable in the victims' bodies. If so, police could prove that murder had been committed.
A "lab of last resort" solving the Efren Saldivar case
Dr. Brian Andresen's lab notebook, May 1, 1999-December 11, 2001
While investigating the Saldivar case, Dr. Andresen kept his records and notes in this lab book. Once he had developed a successful protocol for extracting Pavulon from pig livers, he used it on exhumed tissues from the bodies of the Glendale hospital patients.
Courtesy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Dr. Brian Andresen's lab notebook, May 1, 1999-December 11, 2001
While investigating the Saldivar case, Dr. Andresen kept his records and notes in this lab book. Once he had developed a successful protocol for extracting Pavulon from pig livers, he used it on exhumed tissues from the bodies of the Glendale hospital patients.
Courtesy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Dr. Brian Andresen's lab notebook, May 1, 1999-December 11, 2001
While investigating the Saldivar case, Dr. Andresen kept his records and notes in this lab book. Once he had developed a successful protocol for extracting Pavulon from pig livers, he used it on exhumed tissues from the bodies of the Glendale hospital patients.
Courtesy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Brian Andresen with a sample vial, July 2004
Dr. Andresen had to find some way to detect minute concentrations of Pavulon in long-buried victims—a method of teasing the drug out of decomposed tissue. After weeks of intense 16-hour days, Andresen successfully extracted Pavulon from pig livers using polystyrene divinyl benzene, a polymer originally developed to detect the residue of chemical weapons in body tissues. Andresen then used the same technique on exhumed tissues from Saldivar's patients.
Courtesy Anthony Pidgeon
Hospital pharmacy records for one patient, September 18, 2000
To identify possible victims, police reviewed the hospital records of 1,050 patients who died during or soon after Efren Saldivar's shift. They identified 20 possible victims and exhumed their bodies.
Courtesy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Laboratory Sample Analysis Check Sheet, about 1999
The 20 potential victims in the Saldivar investigation are indicated by case numbers in the left-hand column. Those who were found to have Pavulon in their bodies are marked with a "+." Dr. Andresen also tested the soil around the caskets, and every type of embalming fluid used on the victims' bodies, to make sure there was no cross-contamination. Six exhumed patients tested positive for Pavulon. The proof was definitive—homicide had taken place. Saldivar had poisoned his victims.
Courtesy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Respiratory therapist Efren Saldivar appears in court, 1998
Hospital murders are notoriously difficult to detect. People are often unaware that murder has been committed, and it is often hard to find evidence of the crime or the identities of victims. Saldivar eluded discovery for years.
Courtesy AP / Wide World Photos
The New Forensic Science
Forensic Radiology: Making the Body’s Interior Visible
Radiology can make images of what is hidden inside the body and is a powerful tool for the forensic investigator. Using X-rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other technologies, radiologists can track projectile paths inside the body, help to identify victims whose remains are degraded, and create 3-D images of the human form. Forensic odontologists analyze dental radiographs and use other imaging technologies to identify deceased individuals and to examine evidence related to teeth.
Key accomplishments: radiology
1901
Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen
X-ray Discovered
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen, working with a cathode ray tube in his laboratory, in 1895, discovers "a new kind of ray that can travel great distances, penetrate solid matter, activate fluorescent screens, and expose photographic plates." He receives the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for his work in discovering the X-ray.
1942
Karl Theodore Dussik
Ultrasound First Applied to Medicine
Austrian physiatrist Karl Theodore Dussik publishes a paper on the medical application of ultrasonics in his investigation of the brain. While important to diagnostic medicine, ultrasonics has few applications to forensics.
1952
Felix Block and Edward Purcell
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Developed
Working independently, during the 1940s, Swiss-born physicist Felix Block at Stanford University and American physicist Edward Purcell at Harvard University find that atomic nuclei placed in a magnetic field absorb energy in the range of the spectrum. The nuclei re-emit this energy when they are transferred to their original state. Block and Purcell share the 1952 Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.
When applied to human subjects, the term (NMR) technology becomes known as "magnetic resonance imaging."
1973
Michael E. Phelps and Edward J. Hoffman
PET Scan Developed
American scientists Michael E. Phelps and Edward J. Hoffman develop position emission tomography (PET) scans, a nuclear medicine medical imaging technique which maps the functional processes of the body. The technology is important to diagnostic medicine, but has little application to forensics.
1979
Godfrey N. Hounsfield and Allan M. Cormack
Computed Tomography Developed
During the 1960s, South African-born physicist Allan Cormack of Tufts University and British engineer Godfrey Hounsfield of EMI Laboratories in England contribute separately to the development of computer-assisted tomography. They share the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
2003
Paul C. Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Developed
During the 1970s, American chemist Paul Lauterbur and British physicist Peter Mansfield made pioneering contributions which led to the application of magnetic resonance in medical imaging. They share the 2003 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
The term "nuclear magnetic resonance" (NMR) was dropped because it was feared that people would associate it with atomic radiation. The technique was renamed "magnetic resonance imaging."
Key accomplishments: radiology
Wilhelm Röntgen
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen, working with a cathode ray tube in his laboratory, in 1895, discovers "a new kind of ray that can travel great distances, penetrate solid matter, activate fluorescent screens, and expose photographic plates." He receives the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for his work in discovering the X-ray.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Godfrey Hounsfield
During the 1960s, South African-born physicist Allan Cormack of Tufts University and British engineer Godfrey Hounsfield of EMI Laboratories in England contribute separately to the development of computer-assisted tomography. They share the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
Courtesy National Library of Medicine
Virtopsy: the virtual autopsy
Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), when used with 3-D imaging technology, create vivid images of the interior of the human body. Dr. Richard Dirnhoter and Dr. Michael Thali and thier team of specialists at the University of Bern's Institute of Forensic Medicine, Switzerland are using these new imaging technologies to develop "Virtopsy"—a bloodless and minimally invasive "virtual autopsy" procedure to examine bodies for causes of death.
Virtopsy detects internal bleeding, bullet paths, and hidden fractures hard to find in a traditional autopsy. The MSCT and MRI aid in picturing fracture patterns, bone and missile fragmentation, brain contusion, 3-D bullet localization, gas embolism, and blood aspiration to the lung.
Unlike traditional autopsy, Virtopsy does not destroy human tissue. It can be used when religious beliefs prohibit, or families object to, the cutting open of the body. The developers of Virtopsy do not envision the procedure as a replacement for traditional autopsy but as a tool to be used in cases where dissection of the body is not feasible or where forensic evidence is particularly hard to visualize.
Virtopsy: the virtual autopsy
Computer reconstruction of bite mark, 2003
Scientists from the Institute of Forensic Medicine collaborated with police in 2003 to solve a triple homicide. Three women were found beaten to death in an apartment outside of Zürich, Switzerland. One victim had a bite mark on her shoulder. After creating dental casts and using 3-D imaging technology to recreate the bite sequence, scientists were able to prove to a jury that the suspect made the mark. He was found guilty.
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
Computer reconstruction of bite mark, 2003
Scientists from the Institute of Forensic Medicine collaborated with police in 2003 to solve a triple homicide. Three women were found beaten to death in an apartment outside of Zürich, Switzerland. One victim had a bite mark on her shoulder. After creating dental casts and using 3-D imaging technology to recreate the bite sequence, scientists were able to prove to a jury that the suspect made the mark. He was found guilty.
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
This CT section of a gunshot wound shows bone and bullet fragments in the wound track (see arrow). There is outward beveling at the exit wound of the skull, 2003
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
This right anterior view of a three-dimensional CT reconstruction of the bony skull with bullet wounds shows the hole of the exit wound through the right-sided temporal entrance wound, 2003
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
Classical CT scout view, 2003
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
This MRI cross section shows the wound track through the brain stem and the cerebellum (see arrow), 2003
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
Skeletal reconstruction, 2003
Courtesy Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern
Could X-rays Have Saved President William McKinley?
At the 1901 Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York, an assassin shot President William McKinley twice at close range with a .32 caliber revolver. One bullet grazed McKinley's sternum (breastbone) and another penetrated his stomach.
A hastily assembled medical team, headed by a gynecological surgeon, operated immediately at the small Exposition hospital, but the second bullet could not be found. After cleaning the stomach cavity, the surgeon closed the incision with black silk thread and a straight sewing needle. A worried McKinley aide sent word to inventor Thomas Edison to rush an X-ray machine to Buffalo to find the stray bullet. It arrived but wasn't used.
The medical team reported that the president was improving. McKinley's family, Congress, and the public believed he was going to recover. Instead, he died the morning of September 14. At the autopsy, physicians found that the unrecovered bullet did not cause the death of the President through loss of blood and resultant shock. Instead, gangrene had developed along the path of the bullet, and McKinley died of septic shock due to bacterial infection.
Could X-rays Have Saved President William McKinley?
The needle used to sew up McKinley's wound, 1901
Courtesy Theodore Roosevelt Inaugural Site Foundation
The operating room at the Exposition hospital, 1901
Courtesy Robert L. Brown History of Medicine Collection, Health Sciences Library, University at Buffalo (SUNY)
The shooting of President McKinley from Leslie’s Weekly, September 21, 1901
Courtesy Robert L. Brown History of Medicine Collection, Health Sciences Library, University at Buffalo (SUNY)
The New Forensic Science
Human Rights and Forensics
Forensic science now plays a vital role in exposing political murders and governmental, military, and paramilitary atrocities. Forensic human rights investigations are underway in over 30 countries, conducted by nongovernmental organizations, national truth commissions, and international tribunals. Using archaeology, forensic anthropology, pathology, odontology (the study of dentition), ballistics, computer modeling, and DNA analysis, investigators have documented mass murder and genocide, and identified victims and perpetrators.
Forensic investigations have made the "disappeared"—victims of murder and torture—visible, empowered survivors, corrected the historical record, and exposed cover-ups. In countries traumatized by brutal regimes, human rights forensics promotes democratization and the rule of law. Yet few suspected perpetrators come to trial and even fewer are convicted. In places where human rights violators retain power, forensic teams work at great personal risk, in the face of violence and intimidation.
The global reach of forensics
The Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym) became an international phenomenon in the early 1990s, starting projects in El Salvador and the Philippines, where governmental military and paramilitary forces had committed political murders and atrocities. Since then, EAAF members have conducted investigations throughout the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Europe. Members have presented their findings as expert witnesses in criminal trials, and before international tribunals and national truth commissions.
Inspired partly by EAAF, other human rights forensics groups have emerged to conduct investigations into political murder, torture, and genocide. Today, the International Forensics Program of Physicians for Human Rights, Inforce, the Latin American Forensic Anthropology Association, and local nongovernmental organizations are active in many countries.
Making the "disappeared" visible
In the "Dirty War" that took place between 1976 and 1983, Argentina's military regime committed massive human rights violations. Nearly 20,000 men, women and children were "disappeared" (los desaparecidos)—abducted, tortured, raped, and murdered—with no information provided on their whereabouts.
When the junta fell, the new civilian government invited forensic scientists from the American Association for the Advancement of Science to help investigate. Outside aid was critical—many Argentinean forensic professionals were implicated in the crimes of the junta, compromised by their association with the state, or poorly trained under a regime that discouraged investigation.
In 1984, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team, or EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
"I'm not an advocate, I'm an expert. Unless you maintain…objectivity, you lose credibility.…and the best way is to let the bones speak for themselves."
—Clyde Snow, American forensic anthropologist
Bones as witnesses
In a landmark trial in 1985, forensic testimony helped convict six of nine former Argentinean military junta leaders for the deaths of the "disappeared." The forensic investigation focused on the exhumation of human remains at individual graves, using archaeological techniques and laboratory identification methods. The forensic volunteers, led by Clyde Snow, decided to present representative cases at the trial. One of the most dramatic was the case of Liliana Pereyra, a young woman who was abducted, tortured, raped, and murdered—after giving birth to a child whose identity and whereabouts are still unknown.
"Bones make great witnesses, they speak softly but they never forget and they never lie…."
—Clyde Snow, American forensic anthropologist
Making the "disappeared" visible
Liliana Pereyra, mid-1970s
“In the trial against the generals, we decided to present evidence on the case of Liliana Pereyra—a 21-year-old bank clerk who had disappeared on October 6, 1976, when she was five months pregnant.” —Clyde Snow
Courtesy Family of Liliana Pereyra; American Association for the Advancement of Science Archives
Liliana Pereyra's skeletal reconstruction, about 1985
“Once the bones arrive in the laboratory…We arrange them in what we call "anatomical order" just as if the person was lying on the table, with…her arms extended… .then we begin our more detailed examination of the bones… “—Clyde Snow
Courtesy Family of Liliana Pereyra; American Association for the Advancement of Science Archives
Liliana Pereyra's pelvis, about 1985
“[We] found no fetal bones with the skeleton… .But we did find pitting on the preauricular sulcus [groove on the sacroiliac joint] that told us that she had given birth…to a healthy baby…after which she was never seen again.” —Clyde Snow
Courtesy Family of Liliana Pereyra; American Association for the Advancement of Science Archives
Liliana Pereyra's skull reconstruction, about 1985
“Larry Levine [a forensic odontologist] uncovered a vital link—just a few weeks before she disappeared, she'd had her upper left canine extracted… .Levine found the same tooth missing from the skeleton's otherwise perfect teeth….” —Clyde Snow
Courtesy Family of Liliana Pereyra; American Association for the Advancement of Science Archives
Clyde Snow at the trial of the Argentinean junta, 1985
“When they first began to train with me, the students were understandably uneasy….They could well have ended up on the new government's list of undesirables.” —Clyde Snow, American forensic anthropologist
Courtesy Daniel Muzio
Clyde Snow with young Argentinean volunteers, about 1985
“When they first began to train with me, the students were understandably uneasy… .They could well have ended up on the new government's list of undesirables.” —Clyde Snow, American forensic anthropologist
Courtesy Clyde Snow
Bearing Witness: Origins of EAAF
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: Bones as Witness
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: Grave Methods
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: Making Visible
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: Public Proof
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: El Mozote
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Bearing Witness: Going Global
In 1984, after the fall of the Argentinean junta, anthropologist Clyde Snow recruited a group of Argentinean university students who lacked training in forensics, but were eager to learn. Together, they excavated hundreds of clandestine mass graves. This painstaking work led to the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF in the Spanish acronym), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to using forensic science to investigate human rights abuses.
Continue To The Next Section