Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

HSRProjSet XML Element Descriptions and their Attributes

 HSRProjSet XML Element Descriptions and their Attributes

The elements and attributes described in this document are defined in the HSRProjSet.dtd and are used in the HSRProj XML output files. The HSRProjSet.dtd is available at //www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/dtd/nlmhsrproj_160701.dtd. All files listed are cumulative to the date listed in the download. Updates to this cumulative file will be mounted at least quarterly.  For more information on the download procedures, visit https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hsrproj_xml.html.

Structure of the HSRProjSet.dtd:
The HSRProjSet.dtd defines a XML structure for records in the HSRProject collection. At the highest level, the DTD requires a root element named "HSRProjSet". The <HSRProjSet> root element is comprised of one or more instances of the top-level <HSRProj> element, and may optionally contain one instance of the top-level <DeleteCitation> element.

The <DeleteCitation> element is present in the <IndexHSRProjSet> when records have been deleted from HSRProj. The <DeleteCitation> element contains only the unique identifier of each deleted record and is defined more fully at the end of this document.

Structure of the element descriptions in this document:
Following a description of <HSRProj> parent element, this document continues with descriptions of its 20 child elements based on the alphabetical order of the HSRProj XML file. The <HSRProj> child elements are numbered for convenience and readability.

Each of the 20 numbered sections includes the following information, if applicable:

SAMPLE RECORD

<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<Hsrproj>
      <ProjectID>99999999</ProjectID>
    +<DateCreated>
    -<DateCompleted>
       <Year>2222</Year>
       <Month>01</Month>
       <Day>01</Day>
    </DateCompleted>
    -<DateRevised>
       <Year>2016</Year>
       <Month>06</Month>
       <Day>08</Day>
    </DateRevised>
    -<DatePublished>
       <Year>2014</Year>
       <Month>01</Month>
       <Day>13</Day>
    </DatePublished>
    <ProjectTitle>Quality and coordination of outsourced care for women veterans</ProjectTitle>
    -<Investigator ValidYN="Y">
       <LastName>Bastian</LastName>
       <ForeName>Lori</ForeName>
       <Initials>L</Initials>
       <Email>lori.bastian@va.gov</Email>
    </Investigator>
    -<Investigator ValidYN="Y">
       <LastName>Mattocks</LastName>
       <ForeName>Kristin M</ForeName>
       <Initials>KM</Initials>
    </Investigator>
    -<PerformingOrganization>
       <Name>VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven Campus</Name>
       <URLlink>http://www.connecticut.va.gov/Connecticut/index.asp</URLlink>
       <PhoneNumber>(203) 932-5711</PhoneNumber>
       <State>Connecticut</State>
       <Country>United States</Country>
       <ZipCode>06516</ZipCode>
    </PerformingOrganization>
    -<PerformingOrganization>
       <Name>University of Maryland Womens Health Care Center</Name>
       <URLlink>http://www.madeupurl.com</URLlink>
    </PerformingOrganization>
    -<Award>
       <AwardID Source="VA">CRE12-008</AwardID>
        <AwardID Source="RePorter">5I01HX000947</AwardID>
       <AwardIDURL> http://pcori.org/research-results/madeupdata</AwardIDURL>
       -<Agency>
        <Name>Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)</Name>
        <URLlink>http://www.va.gov/</URLlink>
       </Agency>
      -<Agency>
        <Name>Second occurrance of Supporting Agency</Name>
        <URLlink>http://www.madeupurl.com</URLlink>
       </Agency>
       -<InitialYear>
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
       </InitialYear>
       -<FinalYear>
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
       </FinalYear>
       <AwardType>Intramural</AwardType>
       <TotalFundingAmount>400000</TotalFundingAmount>
       -<YearFundingAmount YearType="FY">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Amount>43889</Amount>
       </YearFundingAmount>
      -<YearFundingAmount YearType="FY">
        <Year>2014</Year>
        <Amount>49900</Amount>
      </YearFundingAmount>
      -<YearFundingAmount YearType="FY">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Amount>49913</Amount>
      </YearFundingAmount>
    </Award>
    <ProjectStatus>Ongoing</ProjectStatus>
    -<Abstract>
      <AbstractText Version="1">Background: While the number of women veterans utilizing VA care is rising, many specialized, gender-specific services (e.g. mammography and prenatal care) are not available within the VA. In these instances, federal law enables the VA to pay for veterans' care at outside facilities when the VA does not offer needed care or on an emergency basis when travel to a VA site would not be feasible. Non-VA care can be provided through a number of mechanisms--fee basis, contract care, or university sharing agreements. Despite increasing numbers of women veterans relying on outsourced care for gender-specific services, little is known about the quality of non-VA care, perceptions, and experiences of women veterans who utilize such care, or the experiences of VA providers coordinating care. Objectives: The purpose of our study is to understand providers' and fee basis managers' strategies for provision, coordination, and quality oversight of outsourced care, and to assess perceptions and experiences with non-VA care among women veterans. Follow-up of abnormal mammograms will be used as a case example in aim 3 for evaluating gender-specific non-VA care. Aim #1 is to understand providers' and fee basis managers' strategies for provision, coordination, and quality oversight of non-VA care. Aim #2 is to understand perceptions and experiences with non-VA care among women veterans. Aim #3 is to evaluate the quality of gender-specific services for women veterans using a case example mapped to VHA Handbook priorities (e.g., Do VA facilities utilizing non-VA care for mammography meet key quality standards compared to VA facilities providing in-house mammograms?) Methods: Aims 1 and 2 will use a qualitative approach to examine perceptions and experiences with non-VA care access, provision, and coordination. Specifically, we will use the Women's Health Evaluation Initiative Database (WHEI) to ascertain the top 20 VA sites nationally for non-VA care referrals for women veterans. We will use the WHEI database to identify women veterans from each of those facilities that received non-VA care over the past two fiscal years (FY10-FY12). We will send letters to those women to invite them to participate in the study, and will conduct telephone interviews with a random sample of 6-8 women veterans who are willing to participate from each facility. In addition, we will interview women's health providers and fee basis managers from each of those top 20 facilities to understand their perceptions and experiences with non-VA care. We will transcribe interviews and develop a top-level codebook with both women veterans and VA staff to examine perceptions, experiences, and recommendations for improving non-VA care. Aim 3 is a retrospective electronic medical chart review study. We will use the WHEI to identify women (ages 40-69) at 8 sites with either non-VA or in-house mammograms in FY11. Once we receive this list of patients, we will review the medical records in two phases. We will evaluate whether (1) results of mammograms were appropriately acknowledged in the patient's medical record, and (2) identified abnormal mammograms received appropriate and timely follow-up. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BIRADS) categories of 0 (indeterminate), 4 (suspicious for cancer), or 5 (highly suspicious for cancer) will be classified as abnormal mammograms requiring follow-up procedures. The BIRADS scoring system is done by radiologists who read the mammograms and is included in all mammography reports. We will use this existing scoring system to categorize mammograms requiring 6-month F/U (BIRADS 3) and inadequate or abnormal mammograms (BIRADS 0, 4, and 5). We expect to identify approximately 7,000 women veterans with mammograms and then conduct in-depth medical record reviews for the estimated 210 patients with abnormal mammograms. The dependent variables are 1) a patient-level dichotomous variable indicating whether or not mammogram results have been appropriately acknowledged in the VA medical record; and 2) a patient-level time-to-event variable representing the number of days after an abnormal mammogram that the patient is appropriately evaluated and has completed necessary follow-up procedures. Findings: This project has no findings to report at this time. Impact: Anticipated: Decisions regarding use of non-VA care (including fee basis and contract care) are made and monitored almost entirely within each VA facility (i.e., virtually no centralized oversight). Little is known about how community providers are selected or the quality of the care they provide. Given that the use of non-VA care is increasing within the VA system, understanding the provision, coordination, and perceived quality of this type of care is of utmost importance as the VA continues to understand how to provide the best comprehensive health care for women veterans.</AbstractText>
      <AbstractText Version="2">Background: While the number of women veterans utilizing VA care is rising, many specialized, gender-specific services (e.g. mammography and prenatal care) are not available within the VA. In these instances, federal law enables the VA to pay for veterans' care at outside facilities when the VA does not offer needed care or on an emergency basis when travel to a VA site would not be feasible. Despite increasing numbers of women veterans relying on outsourced care for gender-specific services, little is known about the quality of non-VA care, perceptions and experiences of women veterans who utilize such care, or the experiences of VA providers coordinating care. Objectives: The purpose of our study is to understand providers' and fee basis managers' strategies for provision, coordination, and quality oversight of outsourced care, and to assess perceptions and experiences with non-VA care among women veterans. Follow-up of abnormal mammograms will be used as a case example in aim 3 for evaluating gender-specific non-VA care. Aim #1 is to understand providers' and fee basis managers' strategies for provision, coordination, and quality oversight of non-VA care. Aim #2 is to understand perceptions and experiences with non-VA care among women veterans. Aim #3 is to evaluate the quality of gender-specific services for women veterans using a case example mapped to VHA Handbook priorities (e.g., Do VA facilities utilizing non-VA care for mammography meet key quality standards compared to VA facilities providing in-house mammograms?) Methods: Aims 1 and 2 will use a qualitative approach to examine perceptions and experiences with non-VA care access, provision, and coordination. Specifically, we will use the Women's Health Evaluation Initiative Database (WHEI) to ascertain the top 24 VA sites nationally for non-VA care referrals for women veterans and to identify women veterans from each of those facilities that received non-VA care over the past two fiscal years (FY10-FY12). Veterans will be sent letters to participate and we will conduct telephone interviews with a random sample of 6-8 women veterans from each facility. We will interview women's health providers and fee basis managers from the 24 facilities to understand their perceptions and experiences with non-VA care. We will transcribe interviews and develop a top-level codebook with both women veterans and VA staff to examine perceptions, experiences, and recommendations for improving non-VA care. Aim 3 is a retrospective electronic medical chart review. We will use VINCI to pull administrative data including CDW, DSS, TIU text notes, Vital Status, and CAPRI/VistAWeb access to identify women (ages 40-74) at 8 sites with either non-VA or in-house mammograms in FY12. We will evaluate whether (1) results of mammograms were appropriately acknowledged in the patient's medical record and (2) identified abnormal mammograms received appropriate and timely follow-up. We define abnormal mammogram results, using the existing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS) scoring system, as BI-RADS categories of 0 (indeterminate), 4 (suspicious for cancer), and 5 (highly suspicious for cancer) and we will also examine medical follow-up for BI-RADS 3 (probably benign). Findings: In aim 3, we have identified 7055 completed mammogram requests in FY12. A total of 1377 (19.5%) mammograms were missing BI-RADS scoring from administrative data. We found 783 (11.1%) BI-RADS 0, 21 (0.3%) BI-RADS 4 and 5, and 76 (1.0%) BI-RADS 3 mammograms. Impact: Decisions regarding use of non-VA care (including fee basis and contract care) are made and monitored almost entirely within each VA facility (i.e., virtually no centralized oversight). Given that the use of non-VA care is increasing within the VA system and due to the Choice Act, understanding the provision, coordination, and perceived quality of this type of care is of utmost importance as the VA continues to understand how to provide the best comprehensive health care for women veterans.</AbstractText>
    </Abstract>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Adult</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Aged</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Continuity of Patient Care</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Female</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Health Care Costs</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Humans</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Mammography</DescriptorName>
       <QualifierName>economics</QualifierName>
       <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y">utilization</QualifierName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Multicenter Studies as Topic</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y">Quality of Health Care</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>United States</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName>Veterans</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    -<MeshHeading>
       <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y">Women's Health</DescriptorName>
    </MeshHeading>
    <Keyword>veterans</Keyword>
    <Keyword>women</Keyword>
    <Keyword>care coordination</Keyword>
    <OtherID Source="ClinicalTrials">NCT00991471</OtherID>
    <DataSource>Study of being nicer people</DataSource>
    <NumberOfSubjects>1000</NumberOfSubjects>
    <PopulationBase>National</PopulationBase>
    <StudyDesign>study design data</StudyDesign>
    <StudyPopulation>women veterans</StudyPopulation>
    -<DataBank>
       <DataBankName>HSRProject</DataBankName>
       <AccessionNumber>20132116</AccessionNumber>
       <AccessionNumber>20114180</AccessionNumber>
    </DataBank>
    <GeneralNote>Replaced abstract, 6/25/15</GeneralNote>
    <GeneralNote>CHANGED PO and PI contact information, ADDED second PI (Kristin Mattocks), and ADDED RePORTER Project ID to Other ID field, 1/13/16. Previous State: Connecticut. Previous Zip: 06516. Previous Email: lori.bastian@va.gov. Previous PO: VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven Campus. Previous Phone: (203) 932-5711</GeneralNote>
    <GeneralNote>CHANGED Performing Organization and Performing Organization/PI contact information, 6/8/16. Previous State: North Carolina. Previous Zip: 27705. Previous Email: bastian@uchc.edu. Previous PO: Durham VA Medical Center, Durham Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care. Previous Phone: (919) 286-6936</GeneralNote>
</Hsrproj>

In the top-level element <HSRProj> there are five required elements -

Descriptions

I. <HSRProj>

Required: Yes
Repeatable: Yes
Attributes: (none)
Child Elements: See numbered elements

1. <Abstract>

Required: No
Repeatable: No
Attributes: (none)
Child Elements:

The <Abstract> is an investigator-provided description of the scope of the project. Versions will reflect changes to the description during the life of the project.

Example:

<Abstract><AbstractText Version="1">Background: Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are leading causes of long-term disability among veterans, resulting in the need for care from informal caregivers. Only one evidence-based intervention, the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK I), has been found that comprehensively addresses both caregiver and survivor needs through skill-building strategies, and has demonstrated feasibility and initial efficacy. This program has been recently revised (TASK II), and is currently being tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial of caregivers of civilian stroke patients. This intervention has also been adapted for family caregivers of TBI patients (TASK II-TBI). Objectives: The objectives are to (a) evaluate the efficacy of the revised TASK II in informal caregivers of veterans with stroke and (b) estimate effect sizes for the TASK II intervention for informal caregivers of veterans with TBI. Both TASK II and TASK II-TBI interventions will be compared with an information, support, and referral (ISR) intervention that will serve as an attention control group. Specific aim 1 is to test the short-term and long-term efficacy of the TASK II intervention for improving the primary outcomes of stroke caregivers' depressive symptoms, caregiving-related negative life changes, and unhealthy days. </AbstractText>
  <AbstractText Version="2">Background: Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are leading causes of long-term disability among veterans and result in the need for care from informal caregivers in the home setting. There are very few evidence-based, easy-to-deliver follow-up programs to train veterans and caregivers across multiple domains post injury. The "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths for Veterans (ANSWERS-VA)" intervention aims to provide the veteran and caregiver dyad with a set of practical skills that each can use in coping with and managing symptoms of a brain injury, applying a strength-based approach. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate (a) the efficacy of the ANSWERS-VA dyadic intervention with veterans who have sustained a stroke and/or TBI and their informal caregivers and (b) estimate effect sizes for the ANSWERS-VA intervention. The ANSWERS-VA intervention will be compared with an educational intervention that will serve as an attention control group. Specific aim 1 is to tailor the implementation of the ANSWERS-VA intervention to dyads of veterans post stroke and/or TBI and their informal caregivers (n=10) and modify the implementation processes for the RCT. Specific aim 2 is to test the short-term (immediately post-intervention) and long-term, sustained (12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year) efficacy of the ANSWERS-VA intervention for improving (a) the primary outcomes of the caregivers' quality of life and unhealthy days; and (b) the caregiver mediators of task difficulty, threat appraisal, self-efficacy for caregiving, and optimism. Specific aim 3 is to evaluate program delivery costs for the ANSWERS-VA intervention and the educational attention control procedures, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of the ANSWERS-VA intervention in terms of noncaregiving hours and unhealthy days in caregivers of veterans post stroke and/or TBI. </AbstractText></Abstract>

 

 

 

 

 

-<DataBank> is an envelope that relates the current record to other records in HSRProj.

<DataSource> is the tool from which raw data will be taken for use in the Project

Example(s):
<DataSource>Survey</DataSource>

The <DateCreated> is the date when NLM entered the record into the database.

The <DateRevised> is the date when NLM updated the record.

The <DatePublished> is the date when NLM made the record available to the public.

<GeneralNote> contains supplementary information about the project. It may contain information about subsequent activities regarding the award.

<Investigator> contains the authorship information for the study. Personal names may be repeated if the study is supervised by more than one person. In the event that there is a change in the investigator, the past investigator’s name remains on the project, with the ValidYN attribute set at “N”.

11. <Keyword>

<Keyword> can be medical subjects (diseases, parts of the body, treatments), people, organizations, places, generic categories (like ‘Education’), and more.

12. <MeshHeading>

<MeshHeading> are specifically assigned Medical Subject Headings that describe the topics covered by the study. The <DescriptorName> and/or <QualifierName> can be designated either a major descriptor (an important focus of the project as described) or not.

13. <NumberOfSubjects>

<NumberOfSubjects> contains investigator-supplied data on the number of individuals that will participate in the study.

14. <OtherID>

<OtherID> refers to external databases which have further information on utilities used within the study.  Those databases are:

CTgovID - ClinicalTrials.gov
HSRR - Health Services and Sciences Research Resources

15. <PerformingOrganization >

The <PerformingOrganization> is the organization or company that has received the monetary award to conduct the study. Usually the <Investigator> is an employee of the <PerformingOrganization>

16. <PopulationBase >

<PopulationBase> is the definition of the study population, limited to a specific geographic area.

17. <ProjectID>

The <ProjectID> is an 8-digit alphanumeric identifier used to uniquely identify every record in HSRProj:

18. <ProjectStatus>

The <ProjectStatus> designates whether the project is ongoing (still in process), completed (research has been officially ended) or archived (more than 5 years older than the completed date.

19. <ProjectTitle>

The <ProjectTitle> is the investigator-provided title of the study.

20. <StudyDesign >

<StudyDesign> contains information about the protocol that will be used to conduct the study

21. <StudyPopulation >

<StudyPopulation> contains information about the total number of people from a defined population who will be participating as subjects in the study.

II. <DeleteCitation>

<DeleteCitation> contains unique identifiers for those records in HSRProj that were deleted since the last HSRProj XML distribution.

<!--    This is the Current DTD which the U.S. National Library of Medicine
        has written for External Use.
        (July 1, 2016)  

             
* = 0 or more occurrences (optional element, repeatable)
? = 0 or 1 occurrences (optional element, at most 1)
+ = 1 or more occurrences (required element, repeatable)
| = choice, one or the other but not both
no symbol = required element

 -->
<!-- ======================================================== -->            
<!ENTITY % date "((Year,Month,Day?))">
<!ENTITY % personal.name "(LastName,ForeName?,Initials?,Suffix?)">
<!ENTITY % ContactInformation "(PhoneNumber?,URLlink?,Email?,State?,Country?,ZipCode?)">
<!-- ================================================================= -->
<!-- ================================================================= -->
<!ELEMENT HsrprojSet (Hsrproj+)>
<!-- ================================================================= -->
<!-- This is the top level element for Hsrproj -->
<!ELEMENT Hsrproj (ProjectID, DateCreated, DateCompleted?, DateRevised?, DatePublished?, ProjectTitle,
Investigator*, PerformingOrganization*, Award, ProjectStatus?, Abstract?, MeshHeading+, Keyword*, OtherID*,  
DataSource?, NumberOfSubjects?, PopulationBase?, StudyDesign?, StudyPopulation?, DataBank*,GeneralNote*)>
<!-- ================================================================= -->
<!ELEMENT Abstract (AbstractText+)>
<!ELEMENT AbstractText (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST AbstractText
          Version CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT AccessionNumber (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Agency (Name, URLlink?)>
<!ELEMENT Amount (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Award (AwardID*, AwardIDURL?, Agency+, InitialYear?, FinalYear?, AwardType?, TotalFundingAmount?, YearFundingAmount*)>
<!ELEMENT AwardID (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST AwardID
    Source CDATA #REQUIRED
>
<!ELEMENT AwardIDURL (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT AwardType (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Country (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT DataBank (DataBankName, AccessionNumber+)>
<!ELEMENT DataBankName (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT DateCompleted (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT DateCreated (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT DatePublished (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT DateRevised (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT DataSource (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Day (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT DescriptorName (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST DescriptorName
    MajorTopicYN (Y | N) "N"
>
<!ELEMENT Email (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT FinalYear (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT ForeName (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT GeneralNote (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Initials (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT InitialYear (%date;)>
<!ELEMENT Investigator (%personal.name;)>
<!ATTLIST Investigator
        ValidYN (Y | N) "Y"
>
<!ELEMENT Keyword (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT LastName (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT MeshHeading (DescriptorName, QualifierName*)>
<!ELEMENT Month (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Name (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT NumberOfSubjects (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT OtherID (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST OtherID
    Source CDATA #REQUIRED
>
<!ELEMENT PerformingOrganization (Name, %ContactInformation;)>
<!ELEMENT PhoneNumber (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT PopulationBase (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ProjectID (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ProjectStatus (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ProjectTitle (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT QualifierName (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST QualifierName
    MajorTopicYN (Y | N) "N"
>
<!ELEMENT State (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT StudyDesign (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT StudyPopulation (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Suffix (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT TotalFundingAmount (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT URLlink (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Year (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT YearFundingAmount (Year, Amount)>
<!ATTLIST YearFundingAmount
        YearType (CY | FY) #REQUIRED
>
<!ELEMENT ZipCode (#PCDATA)>
<!--================================================================ -->
<!-- This is the end for HsrProj -->
<!-- ================================================================= -->

Last Reviewed: October 21, 2021